Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tarpaulin manufactured by the appellants was classifiable under Chapter Heading 59.06 or Chapter Heading 59.02 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The classification turned on the test report and the physical inspection of the sample. The base cotton fabric was found to be heavily impregnated, and the impregnation as well as the layer formation were visible to the naked eye. On that basis, Note 5(a) to Chapter 59 was applied, which supported classification under the heading covering such visible impregnation. The facts were distinguished from the relied-upon earlier decision because, in that case, the layer formation was not visible.
Conclusion: The product was correctly classified under CET sub-heading 5906.90, and the challenge to that classification failed.