Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the valuation of PCB sub-assemblies cleared on sale basis to a buyer who used them to manufacture TV sets and returned the finished TVs could be assessed under section 4(1)(a), and whether the matter had to be remanded for fresh valuation on a cost-based basis in accordance with the Board circular and CAS-4.
Analysis: The clearances were not treated as ordinary sales in the normal course because the components were sold for eventual repurchase in the form of finished TV sets. On that footing, section 4(1)(a) valuation was not upheld. The valuation was therefore required to be determined under the appropriate valuation rules. The order also noted that the cost computation adopted below was not in accordance with Circular No. 692/8/2003/C.E. dated 13-2-2003, which requires determination of cost of production in terms of CAS-4. The proper course was to set aside the valuation exercise and require fresh determination after hearing the assessee.
Conclusion: Valuation under section 4(1)(a) was rejected, and the matter was remanded for fresh determination of value under the appropriate cost-based valuation method after re-computation of cost in accordance with the Board circular and CAS-4.