1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of appellants on 'Molten Sulphur' classification dispute.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, MUMBAI, ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of 'Molten Sulphur.' The Tribunal considered Trade ... Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit Issues:Classification of 'Molten Sulphur' under Chapter Heading 2505 or CH 2804.90.In the judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, MUMBAI, the issue revolved around the classification of 'Molten Sulphur' manufactured by the appellants. The appellants classified the product under Chapter Heading 2505, while the Department proposed classification under CH 2804.90. The Tribunal, referring to the Supreme Court's decision, emphasized the binding effect of Trade Notices and the supply of the chemical expert's opinion. The Trade Notice No. 92/86 dated 9-12-1986 indicated that Molten Sulphur should be classified under sub-heading 2505.00 of the Central Excise Tariff. Consequently, the Tribunal found that the appellants had established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience for granting a waiver and stay. Therefore, a full waiver of the pre-deposit amount was granted, and the recovery was stayed, leading to the disposal of the application in favor of the appellants.---