Customs valuation dispute on second-hand machinery: stay granted, pre-deposit waived, and differential duty adjustment restrained.

At the stay stage, CESTAT, Mumbai held that the importer had a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit in a valuation dispute concerning second-hand machinery imported from a related concern. The proposed method of taking the higher of the declared value and a depreciated value was treated as inconsistent with Rule 8(2)(ii) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1985, because it does not permit a system based on choosing the highest of two alternative values. The order also noted that the department had not consistently applied the transaction value approach under Rule 4, and consequently the department was restrained from adjusting the differential duty from the revenue deposit.

---

---

Issues: Whether the importer was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay against adjustment of the differential duty pending disposal of the appeal.

Analysis: The dispute at the stay stage turned on valuation of second-hand machinery imported from a related concern and whether the declared value could be rejected in favour of a higher depreciated value. The importer showed a strong prima facie case, particularly because the proposed approach of taking the higher of the declared value and the depreciated value was found to be inconsistent with Rule 8(2)(ii) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1985, which prohibits a system based on acceptance of the highest of two alternative values. The order also noted that the department's stand was not consistently maintained in applying the transaction value under Rule 4.

Conclusion: Pre-deposit of duty was waived and the department was restrained from adjusting the differential duty from the revenue deposit.

---