Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a change in management of a sick company, arranged during pendency of proceedings before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction without prior approval, could be recognised under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.
Analysis: The statutory framework governing a sick industrial company requires the formulation, examination, sanction and implementation of a rehabilitation scheme under the supervision of the Board. An arrangement affecting control and management of the company, if entered into without the Board's approval and outside the sanctioned statutory process, is inconsistent with the scheme and purpose of the Act. The Court also noted that the arrangement had given rise to disputes and parallel proceedings, reinforcing the impropriety of recognising it in BIFR proceedings.
Conclusion: The unapproved arrangement changing management could not be recognised, and the Board was justified in rejecting it.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition failed, and no interference was called for with the orders declining to recognise the management change.
Ratio Decidendi: During BIFR proceedings, any arrangement for change in control or management of a sick company must conform to the statutory rehabilitation process and cannot be validated if made without prior approval of the Board.