Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Court orders compensation increase for company due to Land Acquisition Officer's failure to serve mandatory notices.</h1> The court held that the Land Acquisition Officer's failure to serve mandatory notices to the company violated the Land Acquisition Act. It directed the ... Compensation at the rate of β‚Ή 2,50,000 per acre for land admeasuring acres 113.44 cents belonging to the company under liquidation which was acquired for a public purpose demanded by official liquidator Held that:- It would help in appropriately and rateably distributing the assets amongst the creditors of the company in winding up as well as observing the priority amongst them as spelt out under section 529A of the Companies Act properly and correctly also. Thus find merit in the contentions canvassed on behalf of the company under liquidation, therefore direct the first respondent to re-determine the amount of compensation payable for the land of an extent of acres 113.44 cents belonging to it which stood acquired in terms of the notifications published in the District Gazettes of Nellore under sub-section (1) of section 4 on May 6, 2006 and July 1, 2006, at the rate of β‚Ή 2,50,000 per acre. Direct the official liquidator to convey his unequivocal consent to accept and receive compensation for the lands belonging to the company under liquidation acquired by the State compulsorily at the rate of β‚Ή 2,50,000 per acre, within 30 days from today. Issues Involved:1. Justification of the Land Acquisition Officer in passing awards without notice to the company.2. Re-determination of compensation payable to the company at par with other landowners.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Justification of the Land Acquisition Officer in Passing Awards Without Notice to the CompanyThe official liquidator of M/s. DCL Maritech Ltd., a company under liquidation, sought directions for the Land Acquisition Officer to pay compensation at Rs. 2,50,000 per acre for land acquired for public purposes. The company was ordered to be wound up on February 19, 2003, and the official liquidator was appointed. The State Government acquired 242.72 acres for a thermal power project and 113.44 acres for Krishnapatnam port. The Land Acquisition Officer deposited Rs. 1,91,62,592 as compensation for the latter acquisition with the Principal Senior Civil Judge's Court, Nellore, as no claims were made.The official liquidator argued that the Land Acquisition Officer failed to serve mandatory notices under Section 9(3) of the Land Acquisition Act to the company, which was in liquidation, thus violating the Companies Act, 1956. The Land Acquisition Officer admitted that notices could not be served as the company's whereabouts were unknown. The award was passed without the company's participation, fixing compensation at Rs. 1,20,000 per acre, whereas other landowners received Rs. 2,50,000 per acre.The court held that the Land Acquisition Officer's failure to serve mandatory notices to the company at its registered office in Hyderabad violated Section 9(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The court emphasized that the service of notice is mandatory and integral to the statutory scheme, and the Land Acquisition Officer's actions were not in compliance with the required legal procedures.Issue 2: Re-determination of Compensation Payable to the Company at Par with Other LandownersThe official liquidator contended that the company court has exclusive jurisdiction over claims involving the company under liquidation, as per Section 446 of the Companies Act. The claim for compensation should be dealt with by the company court, not the civil court, as the Land Acquisition Officer's award was not final and could be challenged.The court agreed, stating that the company court has the power to deal with all issues concerning claims by or against the company for distributing its assets among creditors. The court directed the Land Acquisition Officer to re-determine the compensation at Rs. 2,50,000 per acre, similar to the compensation awarded to other landowners who consented to the amount.The court ordered the official liquidator to convey consent for the revised compensation within 30 days. The Land Acquisition Officer was directed to pass a fresh award and deposit the differential amount before the court by January 31, 2010.Conclusion:The court allowed the application, directing the Land Acquisition Officer to re-determine the compensation for the company's land at Rs. 2,50,000 per acre and deposit the differential amount with the court. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of serving notices and the exclusive jurisdiction of the company court in matters involving companies under liquidation.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found