Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Workers' Claims Prioritized in Liquidation Case for Equitable Fund Distribution</h1> <h3>OL. of Gujarat Rubbers Works Ltd. Versus Manager, Central Bank of India</h3> Workers' claims were considered in a liquidation case regarding fund distribution between secured creditors and workers. The court directed a portion of ... Whether the workers' claim is required to be considered pari passu with the claim of the secured creditor? Held that:- The amount of ₹ 10 lakhs from the available fund in the proceedings of Suit No. 1 of 1988 pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, shall be deposited, with the official liquidator. The official liquidator- shall place the copy of the order before the Tribunal for appropriate compliance. The aforesaid process of depositing the amount of ₹ 10 lakhs shall be completed within the period of four weeks from the date of production of the order before the Tribunal by the official liquidator. After the amount of ₹ 10 lakhs is deposited with the official liquidator, the official liquidator shall disburse the amount to the workers at pro rata proportionate basis by A/c. payee cheque or by crediting the amount in the bank account of concerned worker through electronic mode. The said process shall be completed within six weeks thereafter. The amount of ₹ 43 lakhs plus interest shall remain with the Tribunal subject to final order that may be passed by the Tribunal in the suit. However, if the suit is decreed and the recovery certificate is issued, any surplus amount is available towards workers' claim as per section 529A, the same shall also be distributed accordingly by the Tribunal and in the event there is a failure, the official liquidator shall be at the liberty to move appropriate application before the appropriate forum. The official liquidator shall be at the liberty to make the payment of the bill of chartered accountant of ₹ 6112. Issues:Consideration of workers' claim in a liquidation case for distribution of funds between secured creditors and workers.Analysis:The judgment revolves around the consideration of workers' claims in a liquidation scenario, specifically focusing on the distribution of funds between secured creditors and workers. The official liquidator filed a report to address the workers' claim amounting to Rs. 35,43,705, which was later re-verified by a chartered accountant to be Rs. 32,24,097.89. The central issue was whether the available funds, including the amount realized from the sale of company properties, should be distributed to workers on an ad hoc basis alongside secured creditors.The respondent bank, a secured creditor, filed a suit for Rs. 1,32,46,190 post the company's winding-up order, with the funds realized from property sales held by the bank. The official liquidator argued for pari passu consideration of workers' claims with secured creditors, advocating for the funds to be deposited with the court for equitable distribution to workers. However, the bank contended that the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, empowered the recovery officer of the Debts Recovery Tribunal to handle disbursements, not the company court.The court analyzed the apex court's decision in Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank, emphasizing the need for a recovery certificate against the company for the Tribunal to distribute sale proceeds under the RDB Act. As the suit was pending without a recovery certificate issued, the Tribunal lacked the authority to distribute funds. The court balanced the rights of secured creditors and workers, directing the Tribunal to deposit a portion of the available funds with the official liquidator for workers' distribution under section 529A of the Companies Act.Ultimately, the court ordered Rs. 10 lakhs to be deposited with the official liquidator for workers' distribution, while retaining Rs. 43 lakhs plus interest with the Tribunal pending final orders. The judgment underscored the importance of equitable distribution, highlighting the workers' long-standing claim and the necessity to balance the interests of both secured creditors and workers in a liquidation scenario.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found