1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal upholds duty amount against appellant for not opting for concessional rates</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the duty amount of Rs. 3,13,313.30 against the appellant for a specific period as they were not eligible for ... SSI Exemption The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai confirmed duty of Rs. 3,13,313.30 against the appellant for the period 17-4-1996 to 21-5-1996 as they opted for normal duty rate at the start of the financial year 1996 and could not avail concessional rates thereafter. The appeal was rejected as the proviso of Notification No. 1/93 applied, preventing a reversion to concessional rates in the same financial year.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
