Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a block assessment, income of a period falling within the block period but not taxable can still be treated as undisclosed income merely because the return was not filed.
Analysis: The amendment introduced with effect from 1 July 1995 in section 158BC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 indicated that where the income of a particular assessment year falling within the block period is not taxable, it should not be treated as undisclosed income. In the facts of the case, the Court held that the legislative intent, as reflected by the amendment, governed the issue and that the remaining points were findings of fact based on appreciation of evidence. On that basis, no substantial question of law arose for consideration under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: The answer was against the assessee on interference in appeal, and the appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Income that is not taxable for the relevant assessment year within the block period cannot be treated as undisclosed income merely because the return was not filed, and an appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not lie where no substantial question of law arises.