Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the demand raised by converting additional excise duty into basic excise duty in the light of the exemption notifications.
Analysis: The claim rested on the existence of Notification No. 55/91-C.E., which exempted goods manufactured and cleared by a 100% EOU from additional excise duty under the Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles & Textile Articles) Act, 1978. The impugned demand was sought to be supported by Notification No. 8/97-C.E. as amended, but the record accepted that the earlier exemption notification continued to operate. On that basis, and in view of the finding that the duty shown as basic excise duty effectively absorbed the additional duty component, the matter disclosed a strong prima facie case for interim protection.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.