Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in view of the denial of Modvat credit on inputs lying unused when they had switched over to the compounded levy scheme.
Analysis: The appellants were manufacturing iron and steel items under the compounded levy scheme under section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The department had denied credit under rule 57H(7) read with rule 57F(17) of the Central Excise Rules on inputs lying unused after the switch over. At the stay stage, the Tribunal found that the appellants had shifted to the compounded levy scheme and not to an exemption regime, and that the demands and penalties confirmed could not be upheld prima facie. The issue was left for determination at final hearing, and the case was found fit for complete waiver of the statutory pre-deposit under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of duty and penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.