Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proposed scheme of amalgamation between the transferor-companies and the transferee-company deserved sanction.
Analysis: The transferor-companies and the transferee-company had approved the scheme in their respective board meetings. The required shareholder meetings were dispensed with where permissible, notices were duly issued, and public advertisements were published. The Registrar of Companies raised only compliance observations, which were met by undertakings filed before the Court. The Official Liquidator's report, based on scrutiny by an appointed chartered accountant, disclosed no adverse finding against the conduct of the transferor-companies. No shareholder, creditor, employee, or other interested person opposed the scheme, and the employee interests were protected by the terms of transfer.
Conclusion: The scheme of amalgamation was sanctioned, and the petitions were allowed subject to compliance with the recorded observations and the approval of the High Court of Madras insofar as required for the transferee-company.