Natural justice in classification disputes: nondisclosure of grounds vitiated the order and led to remand for fresh adjudication.

An alteration of classification was held invalid where the grounds for change were not properly disclosed to the assessee, depriving it of a fair opportunity to meet the case. The record showed that the assessee had in fact replied to the notice, but the adjudicating authority incorrectly proceeded on the basis that no reply had been filed. On that footing, the order was found vitiated by breach of natural justice, set aside, and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication after disclosure of the material relied upon and hearing the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned classification order was liable to be set aside for breach of natural justice and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The record showed that the classification was proposed to be altered on grounds not properly disclosed to the assessee, and the assessee had in fact replied to the notice and explained its stand. The adjudicating authority proceeded on a premise that no reply had been filed, which was incorrect. Since the assessee was not given adequate notice of the basis on which the classification was sought to be changed, it was denied a fair opportunity to meet the case against it.

Conclusion: The impugned order was vitiated by breach of natural justice and was set aside, with the matter remanded for de novo decision after disclosure of the material relied upon and opportunity of hearing.

---