TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal upholds credit disallowance under Rule 57-I but sets aside duty demand.</h1> <h3>MAHARASHTRA STEEL INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE</h3> MAHARASHTRA STEEL INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE - 2004 (175) E.L.T. 138 (Tri. - Mumbai) The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the disallowance of credit under Rule 57-I of the Central Excise Rules for the appellants but set aside the duty demand confirmed under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The issue regarding eligibility for concessional rate of duty under Notification 1/93 was decided against the assessees.
TaxTMI 