1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Upholds Tobacco Classification as Branded Manufactured Tobacco</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, upheld the classification of a tobacco product, SAI Bhaiaki Mishri, as branded manufactured tobacco under CET ... Tobacco - Branded manufactured tobacco - SAI Bhaiaki Mishri - Classification of Issues: Classification of tobacco product under CET Heading 2404.90 vs. 2401.00In this judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, the issue revolved around the classification of a tobacco product, SAI Bhaiaki Mishri, manufactured by the respondents. The respondents initially classified the product under CET Heading 2404.90 as branded manufactured tobacco. However, the Assistant Commissioner approved the classification under CET sub-heading 2401.00 as branded unmanufactured tobacco. The Commissioner (Appeals) sided with the respondents, considering the product as a manufactured one under CET 2404.90, leading to an appeal by the Revenue.The Tribunal, comprising Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram and Shri Moheb Ali M., analyzed the case, focusing on Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 24 of the Schedule to CETA, 1985. This note stipulates that certain activities like labelling, repacking, or adopting treatments to make a product marketable amount to manufacture for specific headings, including 2401, 2402, 2403, and 2404. The Tribunal noted that since the product bore the label 'SAI Bhaiaki Mishri,' it satisfied the criteria for deemed manufacture of a new product. Consequently, the Tribunal agreed with the lower appellate authority's decision that the disputed product should be classified as branded manufactured tobacco under CET 2404.90.After hearing arguments from both sides, the Tribunal, in the absence of merit in the Revenue's appeal, upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision and dismissed the appeal. The judgment underscores the importance of considering labeling and marketability aspects in determining the classification of tobacco products under the relevant Central Excise Tariff headings.