Functional tariff classification for capsule-filling machinery places integrated process equipment and related parts under the specific heading, not the residual entry.

Machines used in the integrated capsule-filling process, including capsule inspection, sorting, polishing, filling and loading equipment, were treated as classifiable under Heading 8422 rather than the residual Heading 8479 because their functions were directly connected with filling operations and not independent complete functions. Once those machines fell under Heading 8422, the related parts and accessories used solely or principally with them were classified with the machines under Section XVI Note 2(b) instead of under Heading 8431. The text also notes that no finding was recorded for one item stated not to have been manufactured.

---

---

Issues: Whether the capsule inspection, sorting, polishing, filling and loading machines were correctly classifiable under Heading 8422 rather than Heading 8479, and whether the related parts and accessories were to be classified with those machines or under Heading 8431.

Analysis: The classification dispute turned on the scope of Heading 8422 in the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and the heading notes, as contrasted with Heading 8479, which is a residual entry. The machines at serial numbers 1 to 5, though described as standalone units, performed functions before, during, or after filling of gelatine capsules and were part of the integrated capsule-filling process. Their functions were therefore not treated as independent complete functions for the purpose of classification under the residual heading. Once those machines were held to fall under Heading 8422, the related parts were examined under Section XVI Note 2(b), and, since they were meant solely or principally for use with those machines, they were classified with the machines rather than under Heading 8431. No finding was returned for the item stated not to have been manufactured.

Conclusion: The machines at serial numbers 1 to 5 were held classifiable under Heading 8422.90, and the connected parts at serial numbers 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 13 were also held classifiable under Heading 8422.90. The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent that no finding was recorded for serial number 8.

Final Conclusion: The tariff classification approved by the Department was substantially upheld, with the relevant machines and their parts brought within Heading 8422.90 and the matter disposed of accordingly.

Ratio Decidendi: Where machines perform functions integrally connected with filling operations, they are classified by their functional role under the specific tariff heading and not under a residual heading; corresponding parts used solely or principally with such machines are classified with the machines under the section note governing parts.

---