TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>'Used' under s.32 means actual business use, not mere readiness, so depreciation disallowed for unused vehicle</h1> HC held that the term 'used' in s.32 requires actual use of a vehicle in the business, not mere readiness for use, so an assessee cannot claim ... Depreciation u/s section 32 - Vehicle - interpretation of the word 'used'. – HELD THAT:- Appellant contend that even if the vehicle was not actually used but since it was ready for use, the assessee was entitled to claim the benefit of depreciation on such assets - The word 'used' denotes actually used and not merely ready for use. The expression 'used' means actually used for the purposes of the business - no substantial question of law is involved. The appeal is dismissed in limine The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal, stating that the term 'used' in relation to claiming depreciation on assets means actual use for business purposes, not just being ready for use. The judgment of Whittle Anderson Ltd. v. CIT was considered, but the court emphasized the distinction between 'use' and 'used.' The appeal was dismissed with no costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
