Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court sets aside Tribunal's findings in Income-tax Act case, emphasizing fair assessment & proper evaluation of explanations.</h1> The court set aside the Tribunal's findings in a case involving a block assessment under the Income-tax Act, remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer ... Unaccounted investment – Standard deduction - Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law and fact in deleting the addition of Rs. 14,49,127 made as unaccounted investment of the assessee in the firm, M/s. Eastern Retreads (P.) Ltd.? - Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to standard deduction under section 16(1) of the Income-tax Act? - Since there is no due consideration of the explanation offered by the assessee in respect of the entries contained in the two slips either by the Assessing Officer or by the Tribunal, we are of the view that the matter requires consideration - Tribunal has allowed the claim for standard deduction without any discussion. Since we have already remitted the matter to the AO, we direct the AO to consider the claim of the assessee for standard deduction also afresh Issues:1. Deletion of addition of undisclosed investment2. Remittance of the case for fresh consideration of the addition3. Entitlement to standard deduction under section 16(1) of the Income-tax Act4. Allowing deduction under section 16(1) without determining the employer-employee relationship5. Remittance of the case for a fresh consideration of the issueDeletion of Addition of Undisclosed Investment:The case involved a block assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the period April 1, 1986, to June 17, 1996, where the Revenue challenged the Tribunal's order deleting the addition of Rs. 14,49,127 as unaccounted investment by the assessee. The Assessing Officer inferred undisclosed investment based on seized documents, which the Tribunal found lacking justification. The court noted discrepancies in the Assessing Officer's approach and the Tribunal's reasoning, emphasizing the need for proper consideration of explanations offered by the assessee. Ultimately, the court set aside the Tribunal's findings, remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.Remittance of the Case for Fresh Consideration of the Addition:The court directed the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the matter in light of the explanations provided by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of due consideration of all relevant factors before making additions to the income. The court highlighted the Assessing Officer's failure to adequately address the explanations offered by the assessee, necessitating a fresh assessment to ensure a fair and thorough review of the situation.Entitlement to Standard Deduction under Section 16(1) of the Income-tax Act:Regarding the entitlement to standard deduction, the Tribunal had allowed the claim without detailed discussion. The court, while remitting the case for fresh consideration of the undisclosed investment, also directed the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the claim for standard deduction. It stressed the need to determine the existence of an employer-employee relationship between the assessee and the company where the assessee served as a director.Allowing Deduction under Section 16(1) without Determining the Employer-Employee Relationship:The court highlighted the Tribunal's oversight in allowing the deduction without establishing the employer-employee relationship between the assessee and the company. It emphasized the necessity of determining such a relationship before granting standard deductions under the Income-tax Act, underscoring the importance of proper assessment procedures.Remittance of the Case for a Fresh Consideration of the Issue:In light of the incomplete consideration of explanations and the need to determine the employer-employee relationship for standard deduction, the court remitted the case to the Assessing Officer for a comprehensive reassessment. The court's decision aimed to ensure a thorough examination of all relevant aspects before making any conclusive determinations in the income-tax matter.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found