Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the machine manufactured and cleared by the appellants was classifiable under Heading 84.23 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or under Heading 84.79 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The machine was found to operate by a weighing mechanism with a weigh hopper and feeding arrangement, wherein a predetermined weight was set initially and the material was discharged until the set weight was reached, after which the flaps closed. The goods were not sealed bags, and the machine functioned as a weighing and filling machine rather than as a machine falling under the residuary heading claimed by the appellants. Reference was made to the HSN notes for Heading 84.23, which cover scales for discharging weight, and to Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 84.
Conclusion: The machine was held classifiable under Heading 84.23 and not under Heading 84.79, and the appellants' claim failed.