Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Official Liquidator to Distribute Funds to Creditors; Workers & AMC Claims Satisfied

        Agrawal Textiles Versus Official Liquidator of Shree Vrundavan Processing Mills (P.) Ltd.

        Agrawal Textiles Versus Official Liquidator of Shree Vrundavan Processing Mills (P.) Ltd. - [2006] 72 SCL 291 (GUJ.) Issues Involved:
        1. Disbursement of funds realized from the sale of assets of the company-in-liquidation.
        2. Claims of unsecured creditors.
        3. Claims of secured creditors.
        4. Preferential claims of workers and government dues.
        5. Legal status and priority of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation's (AMC) dues.

        Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

        1. Disbursement of funds realized from the sale of assets of the company-in-liquidation:
        The applicant, Agrawal Textiles, sought a direction to disburse the amount realized from the sale of the company's assets among the unsecured creditors. The assets, including machinery, book debts, stock-in-trade, land, and building, were sold, realizing Rs. 1,83,52,067. Initially, this amount was distributed among Punjab National Bank (PNB) and workers in a 3:1 ratio as per the court's order dated 10-5-2000. However, this order was reviewed, and it was determined that PNB's claim was secured only to the extent of Rs. 21 lakhs, leading to a refund of the excess amount.

        2. Claims of unsecured creditors:
        The applicant claimed Rs. 1,90,300 as an unsecured creditor. The Official Liquidator received claims from five parties, including Agrawal Textiles, totaling Rs. 2,98,359. The applicant and other unsecured creditors were directed to provide further evidence to support their claims. The court permitted the Official Liquidator to disburse the remaining amount to unsecured creditors after satisfying the preferential claims of workers and government dues.

        3. Claims of secured creditors:
        PNB initially claimed Rs. 6,57,84,690 as a secured creditor. However, after investigation, only Rs. 1,83,52,067 was found admissible. The court later determined that PNB's secured claim was limited to Rs. 21 lakhs, and the excess amount was refunded. PNB was considered an unsecured creditor for the remaining amount of Rs. 1,62,52,067.

        4. Preferential claims of workers and government dues:
        Workers' claims were initially assessed at Rs. 74,69,954 but were verified at Rs. 44,25,494. Workers received Rs. 34,88,800, with a remaining claim of Rs. 9,36,694. The court directed the Official Liquidator to pay this amount to workers before any payments to unsecured creditors. Government dues, specifically AMC's property tax claims, were also considered preferential under section 530 of the Companies Act, 1956.

        5. Legal status and priority of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation's (AMC) dues:
        AMC claimed Rs. 1,07,04,997, including principal and interest. AMC argued that its dues should be treated as a first charge on the property, giving it priority over other creditors. However, the court held that AMC's claim should be examined under section 530 of the Companies Act, 1956, which provides for preferential payments in a winding-up scenario. AMC was entitled to dues as on February 1994, amounting to Rs. 13,77,858 plus the amount for the subsequent 12 months.

        Conclusion:
        The court directed the Official Liquidator to disburse the remaining funds among the unsecured creditors after satisfying the preferential claims of workers and AMC. The Official Liquidator was permitted to encash fixed deposit receipts if necessary to make the payments. The application was disposed of with these directions and observations.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found