Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether delay in filing the claim before the Official Liquidator for provident fund contribution dues was liable to be condoned and the claim directed to be registered and adjudicated.
Analysis: The claim related to employees' provident fund contribution and allied dues, which are of a beneficial character for employees. The claim was asserted to fall within the preferential treatment contemplated under section 11 of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and section 530(1)(f) of the Companies Act, 1956. In view of the nature of the dues and the circumstances explained for the delayed filing, the delay was held deserving of condonation.
Conclusion: The delay in filing the claim was condoned, and the Official Liquidator was directed to register the claim and adjudicate it in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The applicant obtained relief on the question of limitation, and its claim was permitted to proceed before the Official Liquidator for decision on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: Delay in presenting a claim for employees' beneficial dues in winding-up proceedings may be condoned where the circumstances justify it and the claim is otherwise required to be considered in accordance with law.