Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the inkjet printing machine combined with the rewinding machine used for printing particulars on soap wrappers was eligible as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The machine was used to print mandatory particulars such as date of packing and price on soap wrappers, which were required under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Packaged Commodity Rules, 1977. Soap could not be lawfully marketed without compliance with these printing requirements. An used to render goods marketable and to carry out an operation incidental and ancillary to manufacture falls within the scope of manufacture for excise purposes, and the stage at which the process occurs is not decisive.
Conclusion: The machine qualified for capital goods credit under Rule 57Q, and denial of credit was not sustainable.