Court dismisses challenge to SEBI Act notice; compliance deemed sufficient without providing copy to petitioner.

The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a show-cause notice issued under the SEBI Act. It held that compliance with section 11C(1) did not require providing a copy of the order to the petitioner. The court found that the notice indicated sufficient compliance with the Act, and the petitioner was instructed to cooperate in the investigation for a prompt conclusion.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to show-cause notice under SEBI Act - Compliance with section 11C(1) - Requirement of providing copy of order to petitioner - Cooperation in investigation.

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged a show-cause notice issued by the Investigating Officer under sections 11C(1)(6), 15A, and 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, through a writ under article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. The challenge was based on the absence of a written order appointing an investigating authority by the Board as required by section 11(1) and the failure to provide a copy of the order to the petitioner before issuing the notice. The respondent argued that the challenge was premature, there was compliance with section 11C(1), providing a copy of the order was unnecessary, and the petitioner was not cooperating in the inquiry.

The court found no merit in the writ petition after hearing both parties and examining the case record. Section 11C(1) of the Act mandates an order in writing by the Board to direct an investigating authority to investigate the affairs of an intermediary or persons associated with the securities market. The section does not impose an obligation to provide a copy of the order to the person concerned. The legislative intent does not require explicit language for providing a copy. The focus at the investigation stage is to grant an opportunity to the person concerned, which was being done in this case.

The court noted that the impugned show-cause notice indicated compliance with the requirement of section 11C(1) by mentioning that proceedings were initiated based on an order passed by the Board on May 14, 2003. This compliance was deemed sufficient to issue the notice in accordance with the Act. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, but the respondents were directed to ensure the prompt completion of the investigation and the petitioner was instructed to cooperate in the inquiry for its expeditious conclusion.

---