Correct classification and no misdeclaration defeat confiscation and penalty where goods' irregular shape is not legally decisive.

Imported goods declared as a methanol resistant compound were correctly classified under Chapter sub-heading 3904.90, and their irregular shape did not by itself establish misdeclaration. In the absence of any legal requirement to state whether the goods were in sheet form or bulk form, confiscation under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act was not justified. The discussion further notes that penalty could not stand where misdeclaration was not proved. The lower authorities' classification finding was therefore set aside, and confiscation and penalty were held unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported goods were correctly classified and whether confiscation and penalty under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962 were sustainable in the absence of misdeclaration.

Analysis: The imported item was declared as a methanol resistant compound and the classification claim under Chapter sub-heading 3904.90 was found to be correct. The mere fact that the goods were in irregular shape did not establish misdeclaration or justify resort to confiscation under Section 111(m). The law did not require the importer to specify whether the goods were in sheet form or bulk form when such disclosure was not mandated.

Conclusion: Confiscation and penalty were held unsustainable, and the classification determined by the lower authorities was set aside.

---