Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a dispute concerning valuation of goods manufactured as job workers.
Analysis: The applicants were manufacturing P&P medicines on behalf of loan licensees and the goods were transferred to the licensees' depots as stock transfers. The Tribunal noted, prima facie, that the applicants were manufacturers and that their factory gate was to be treated as a deemed factory gate. On that basis, the assessable value was to be worked out on the deemed sale price in terms of the principle in Ujagar Prints, and the invocation of Section 4(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not, prima facie, attracted. The transaction was viewed, prima facie, as falling under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 even after the amendment to Section 4.
Conclusion: A strong prima facie case was held to exist and waiver of pre-deposit of duty and equal penalty was granted with stay of recovery pending the appeal.