Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Modvat credit was admissible on manufacturer's invoices not pre-authenticated. (ii) Whether Modvat credit could be denied on the basis that the goods were accompanied by subsidiary gate passes.
Issue (i): Whether Modvat credit was admissible on manufacturer's invoices not pre-authenticated.
Analysis: The invoices were manufacturer's invoices and did not require pre-authentication. The duty-paid nature of the goods was not in dispute.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the invoices was admissible, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether Modvat credit could be denied on the basis that the goods were accompanied by subsidiary gate passes.
Analysis: The goods had been imported under Bills of Entry on which credit was otherwise available. The subsidiary gate passes issued by the department were only supporting documents and not the sole basis of credit.
Conclusion: Credit could not be denied on this ground, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was sustained and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit cannot be denied merely because manufacturer's invoices were not pre-authenticated or because subsidiary gate passes accompanied goods when the duty-paid nature of the goods and the underlying entitlement to credit are established.