Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for valuation under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the ex-factory price was to be adopted where factory-gate sales were admittedly made and the assessee also sold goods through a depot.
Analysis: The departmental case rested on the contention that depot sales were at a higher price and that factory sales were negligible. The record, however, showed no finding that the factory-gate sale price was not genuine. The ex-factory price was ascertainable and there was no evidence to displace it. In such circumstances, the price at the depot was not relevant for valuation.
Conclusion: The ex-factory price was correctly taken as the basis of valuation under Section 4, and the department's appeals were not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the ex-factory price is ascertainable and genuine factory-gate sales exist, valuation must be based on that price under Section 4, and depot sales do not alter the assessable value.