Central Excise duty timing dispute over Budget day clearances was referred to a Larger Bench for authoritative resolution.

Clearances made on Budget day after 11.00 A.M. raised the question whether an undertaking under Rule 224(2A) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 made duty payable at the enhanced rate before the new notification took effect, or whether the increase operated only prospectively from midnight. Conflicting Tribunal views on the interaction between Rule 224(2A), Rule 9A(1) and Notification No. 7/2000-C.E. (N.T.) led to the conclusion that the issue required authoritative resolution. The matter was therefore referred to a Larger Bench, and no final decision on the merits was rendered.

---

---

Issues: Whether the undertaking furnished under Rule 224(2A) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 would make duty at the enhanced rate payable on clearances made on Budget day after 11.00 A.M. and before the enhanced rate notification took effect, and whether the conflicting Tribunal views required reference to a Larger Bench.

Analysis: The clearances were made pursuant to an undertaking under Rule 224(2A), and rival Tribunal decisions had taken different views on whether such an undertaking bound the assessee to the enhanced rate or whether the budget-rate increase operated only prospectively from midnight. In view of the apparent conflict between the authorities and the need to examine the interaction between Rule 224(2A), Rule 9A(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Notification No. 7/2000-C.E. (N.T.), the matter was considered fit for resolution by a Larger Bench.

Conclusion: The question was not finally decided on merits and was referred for decision by a Larger Bench.

---