1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Importers' appeal dismissed by CESTAT for failure to prove excess duty not passed on to customers. Refund denied.</h1> The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai as the importers failed to prove that the excess duty paid was not passed on to ... Refund (Customs) - Unjust enrichment The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai as the importers failed to prove that the excess duty paid was not passed on to customers. The claim for refund of duty on electronic typewriters was denied, and the amount was credited to the Welfare Fund under Section 27(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The evidence provided by the importers was deemed insufficient to support their plea, and the bar of unjust enrichment was applied, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
