TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Importers' appeal dismissed by CESTAT for failure to prove excess duty not passed on to customers. Refund denied.</h1> <h3>GODREJ PACIFIC TECHNOLOGY LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI</h3> GODREJ PACIFIC TECHNOLOGY LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI - 2003 (157) E.L.T. 410 (Tri. - Mumbai) The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai as the importers failed to prove that the excess duty paid was not passed on to customers. The claim for refund of duty on electronic typewriters was denied, and the amount was credited to the Welfare Fund under Section 27(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The evidence provided by the importers was deemed insufficient to support their plea, and the bar of unjust enrichment was applied, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
