TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Refund claim for CVD on Petroleum Jelly denied due to missing original bill: Tribunal ruling</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the rejection of a refund claim for CVD paid on the import of Petroleum Jelly due to non-availability of the ... Refund claim - Refund claimed by buyer/importer The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the rejection of a refund claim for CVD paid on import of Petroleum Jelly due to non-availability of original triplicate bill of entry and unjust enrichment. The Tribunal found that the filing of the Original Triplicate Bill of Entry (OTBE) is not mandatory for refund claims as long as necessary details are available in duplicate and quadruplicate copies of the bill of entry. However, the claim was rejected on the grounds that only the actual importer who paid the duty, in this case, M/s. Richardson Hindustan Ltd., could claim the refund. The appeal was rejected based on the language of Section 27 of the Customs Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
