Residual exemption entry using "others" broadly covered cotton fabrics outside the specific handloom category.

An unqualified residual entry in an exemption notification must be read broadly: where Serial No. 5(i) specifically covered processed woven handloom fabrics, the term "others" in Serial No. 5(ii) was construed to include all cotton fabrics not falling within clause (i). The Revenue's attempt to confine clause (ii) to powerloom fabrics alone was held unsustainable, so handloom fabrics processed by the assessee remained within the exemption. The challenge to exemption therefore failed and the assessee's position was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the expression "others" in Serial No. 5(ii) of Notification No. 41 of 1995-C.E. covered cotton fabrics processed by the respondent, including handloom fabrics not falling under Serial No. 5(i).

Analysis: Serial No. 5(i) specifically dealt with woven handlooms processed by the specified categories of processors. Serial No. 5(ii) used only the word "others" without any restrictive qualification such as "other than handlooms". The residual expression was therefore read as meaning all cotton fabrics not covered by clause (i), and not as a category confined to powerloom fabrics alone. On that construction, the Revenue's attempt to exclude handloom fabrics from clause (ii) was held unsustainable.

Conclusion: The expression "others" in Serial No. 5(ii) covered all cotton fabrics not included in Serial No. 5(i), and the exemption was available to the respondent.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the grant of exemption failed, and the order in favour of the assessee was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: A residual entry using the unqualified term "others" in an exemption notification must be construed broadly to cover all goods not specifically enumerated in the preceding specific entry.

---