Excise duty collected from buyers is treated as a Section 11D issue rather than recovery under Section 11A.

Amounts collected from buyers as representing excise duty, where the amount collected exceeded the duty deposited, are discussed as falling more appropriately under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act rather than Section 11A. The text notes that Section 11D was retrospectively amended from 12-5-2000 and that the lower authorities had not recorded findings under the correct provision. Confiscation of goods and penalty were left open for reconsideration.

---

---

Issues: Whether the demand could be sustained under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 when the dispute, on the facts found, was that the manufacturer had collected an amount from buyers as excise duty in excess of the duty deposited, and whether the matter required consideration under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis: The amount collected from buyers as representing excise duty was not in dispute. The Tribunal held that recovery could not be made under Section 11A on these facts and that the case was more appropriately covered by Section 11D. It noted that Section 11D had been amended retrospectively with effect from 12-5-2000 and that the lower authorities had not recorded findings under the correct provision. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration under Section 11D. The questions relating to confiscation of goods and penalty were left open for reconsideration.

Conclusion: The recovery was not sustained under Section 11A and the matter was remitted for de novo consideration under Section 11D, with the appellant obtaining a remand on this issue.

---