Compromise and arrangement rejected for lack of truthful financial disclosure and an unworkable scheme under company law.

A scheme of compromise and arrangement under the Companies Act, 1956 was refused because the company did not make a true and correct disclosure of its financial position. The Court found that the balance sheet and supporting statements did not present a reliable picture of liabilities and recoveries, and that the projected sources of payment lacked credibility. Repeated adjournments also supported the view that the proposal was being delayed without a workable foundation. On these facts, the arrangement was held unfair and incapable of implementation, and no direction was made to progress the scheme.

---

---

Issues: Whether the proposed compromise and arrangement under section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 deserved court approval and directions for convening a meeting of creditors.

Analysis: The scheme was examined against the company's financial disclosures, the objectors' material, and the consistency of the balance sheet and supporting statements. The Court found that the company had not made a true and correct disclosure of its financial position, that the accounts did not present a reliable picture of its liabilities and recoveries, and that the projected sources of payment lacked credibility. It also found that the company had repeatedly sought adjournments over a long period, delaying consideration of the application. On these facts, the Court held that the foundation of the scheme was unfair and that the proposal was not capable of implementation.

Conclusion: The application for compromise and arrangement under section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 was rejected.

Final Conclusion: The proposed arrangement was found unreliable and unworkable, and no order was made for progressing the scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: A compromise or arrangement will not be approved where the applicant fails to place a truthful financial picture before the Court and the scheme, on its face and in the surrounding circumstances, appears unfair or incapable of implementation.

---