Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether lubricating oils and greases used for crusher and material-handling machinery located outside the approved factory premises were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: Rule 57Q required the capital goods to be used in the factory of manufacture of the final product. The limestone mine and crusher site were not included in the approved ground plan of the factory under Rule 44. Goods used outside the approved factory area could not be treated as part of the factory under Section 2(e) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The lubricants were used only for machinery situated and operating outside the factory, and the earlier decision in the same assessee's case had already held the machinery itself to be ineligible capital goods. The decisions cited on crushing of limestone as manufacture were treated as distinguishable and, in any event, inconsistent with the later Supreme Court view on the meaning of manufacture.
Conclusion: The lubricants used in the crusher and other material-handling equipment outside the cement factory were not eligible capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q.