Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proviso to section 9(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies to sales that are held to fall under section 3(a) of the Act and, if not, which State is competent to levy and collect tax on such sales.
Analysis: Section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 determines whether a sale is inter-State by reference to whether the sale occasions movement of goods from one State to another or is effected by transfer of documents of title during such movement. Section 6(2) grants exemption only to qualifying subsequent sales during movement, subject to its statutory conditions. The proviso to section 9(1) is confined to subsequent sales covered by section 3(b) and does not govern sales already found to fall under section 3(a). Where the taxing authority has concluded that the transactions are sales under section 3(a), the proviso to section 9(1) cannot be invoked to fasten tax in a different State on the footing of a subsequent sale.
Conclusion: The proviso to section 9(1) was inapplicable, and the tax on the sales falling under section 3(a) was leviable in the State from which the movement of the goods commenced. The assessee succeeded.