Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2004 (9) TMI 72 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules income from Sikkim lottery taxable under Income-tax Act The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee in a case concerning the taxability of income from the Sikkim State lottery under the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules income from Sikkim lottery taxable under Income-tax Act

                          The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee in a case concerning the taxability of income from the Sikkim State lottery under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the income from the lottery, received in Jaipur, India, is taxable under the Act as the assessee is an ordinary resident of India. Additionally, the deduction under section 80TT should be based on the net amount of the lottery winnings after deducting expenses, aligning with the provisions of the relevant sections of the Act.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Taxability of income from Sikkim State lottery under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Applicability of deduction under section 80TT on the net winning amount or the gross amount of the winning prize.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Taxability of Income from Sikkim State Lottery
                          The Tribunal examined whether the income from the Sikkim State lottery, won by a resident Indian, is taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not applicable to Sikkim during the relevant assessment year (1986-87) as Sikkim was not originally part of India when the Act was enacted. The Income-tax Act was extended to Sikkim only from the assessment year 1990-91, following a Presidential notification under Article 371F(n) of the Constitution. The assessee contended that the income earned in Sikkim should not be taxed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it was already subjected to tax under Sikkim's income-tax laws, thus raising the issue of double taxation.

                          The Tribunal rejected the assessee's contention, emphasizing that the assessee, being an ordinary resident of India, is subject to the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The income from the lottery was received in Jaipur, India, and thus falls within the ambit of section 5(1)(a) of the Act, which includes income received or deemed to be received in India by a resident. The Tribunal clarified that the principle of double taxation does not apply when taxes are imposed by different legislative authorities under different enactments. The Tribunal referred to several Supreme Court decisions, including Sri Krishna Das v. Town Area Committee, Chirgaon, and CIT v. Dharamdas Hargovandas, to support its conclusion that double taxation under different laws is permissible.

                          The Tribunal also addressed the issue of extra-territorial operation of the Income-tax Act, 1961, under Article 245 of the Constitution, which allows Parliament to make laws with extra-territorial operation. The Tribunal concluded that the income from the lottery, having been received in Jaipur, is taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961, irrespective of its accrual in Sikkim.

                          Issue 2: Deduction under Section 80TT
                          The second issue pertained to whether the deduction under section 80TT should be applied to the gross amount of the lottery winnings (Rs. 20 lakhs) or the net amount after deducting expenses (Rs. 18 lakhs). The assessee argued that the deduction should be on the gross amount, while the Assessing Officer allowed the deduction on the net amount.

                          Section 80TT, which provides for deductions in respect of winnings from lotteries, was examined in conjunction with sections 80B and 80AB. Section 80B defines "gross total income" as the total income computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act before making any deductions under Chapter VI-A. Section 80AB specifies that deductions under Chapter VI-A should be computed based on the income of the nature included in the gross total income, as computed in accordance with the Act.

                          The Tribunal concluded that the deduction under section 80TT should be based on the net amount of the lottery winnings included in the gross total income after accounting for expenses. This interpretation aligns with the provisions of sections 80B and 80AB, which require the income to be computed in accordance with the Act before applying deductions. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Distributors (Baroda) P. Ltd. v. Union of India and other relevant cases to support its conclusion.

                          Conclusion:
                          Both issues were decided in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The Tribunal held that the income from the Sikkim State lottery is taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the deduction under section 80TT should be applied to the net amount of the lottery winnings included in the gross total income.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found