Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation under section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be denied on two oil tankers on the ground that they were not shown to have been registered or lawfully plied on the relevant date, despite material showing delivery, registration steps, road tax payment, challan and penalty on the last day of the accounting year.
Analysis: Depreciation under section 32 is available where the assessee owns the asset and uses it for the purposes of business. The expression "used" is not confined to active, full-year or legally perfect user; it includes passive user and assets kept ready for use. The presumption under section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 regarding regular performance of official and judicial acts was relevant to the challan and criminal court order, and the authorities below could not reject that material on speculation or conjecture. Registration under the motor vehicle law was not treated as a decisive condition for income-tax depreciation, and the evidence indicated that the tankers had in fact been put to business use in the relevant year or, at the least, were ready for such use.
Conclusion: Depreciation could not be denied, and the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on the two oil tankers.