Fact-intensive customs dispute required fresh adjudication after ex parte order and disputed evidence on classification and clandestine clearances.

Ex parte adjudication on disputed classification, limitation, retracted statements, alleged clandestine clearances, and the evidentiary value of seized documents required proper factual appreciation before liability and penalties could be decided. Because the record involved multiple fact-intensive controversies and corroboration issues, the appellate forum found final determination inappropriate at that stage and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication by the authorities below.

---

---

Issues: Whether, in view of the ex parte adjudication and the disputed factual matrix, the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The controversy involved several factual questions relating to classification, limitation, retracted statements, alleged clandestine clearances, corroboration of documents, and the evidentiary value of seized material. The adjudicating authority had proceeded ex parte, and the record showed that proper appreciation of facts and evidence was necessary before liability and penalties could be conclusively determined. The appellate forum found that such fact-intensive issues were not suitable for final determination at that stage.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the authorities below for fresh adjudication and proper appreciation of facts.

---