Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty paid on inputs in respect of which Modvat credit has been availed is includible in the assessable value of the final product under the excise valuation provisions.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench ruling that Modvat credit represents a credit mechanism under which duty paid on inputs does not form part of the assessable value of the finished product under Section 4(1)(b) of the Central Excises and Salt Act and Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975. It also noted that in cases of captive consumption the declared cost must be examined to ensure that excise duty on inputs has not already been included, since the same amount cannot be deducted twice.
Conclusion: Duty paid on inputs on which Modvat credit was availed was held not includible in the assessable value of the final product, and the appeal was allowed.