TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal upholds duty demand on HDPE granules despite time limit issue. Larger Bench to review time limitation rule.</h1> <h3>CHETAN CONTAINERS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MUMBAI-VI</h3> The Appellate Tribunal confirmed duty demand on HDPE granules for home consumption instead of export. The demand was upheld despite exceeding the ... Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai confirmed duty demand of Rs. 1,93,840/- on HDPE granules used for home consumption instead of export after being used in drum manufacture. The demand was beyond six months, and the time limit under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was not applied to demands under Rule 196. The issue of time limitation under Section 11A in Rule 196/223A was referred to a Larger Bench in CCE, Jamshedpur v. Tata Iron & Steel Company. Waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty of Rs. 20,000/- was granted pending appeal due to the reference to the Larger Bench.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
