1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CEGAT Bangalore remands eligibility appeals for Modvat credit due to factual discrepancy</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bangalore remanded four appeals concerning the eligibility of items for Modvat credit back to the adjudicating authority due ... Modvat/Cenvat The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bangalore involved four appeals regarding the eligibility of certain items for Modvat credit. The items in question were Connectors filling compound, Sealant Box, Application tool for the final product, and Adopter plate. The appellant argued that these items were essential accessories to the main product and their cost was included in the assessable value of the connectors. The Revenue contended that these items were not accessories and not essential to the main product. The Tribunal found a factual discrepancy and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for further examination, allowing the appeals by way of remand.