1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Grants Modvat Credit for Pre-Registration Invoices</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting Modvat credit to the appellant. It held that the invoices contained essential particulars and were supplemented ... Modvat/Cenvat Issues:Appeal against denial of Modvat credit due to incomplete invoices and unregistered dealer.Analysis:The appellant, engaged in manufacturing electrical goods, faced denial of Modvat credit due to incomplete invoices lacking specific details and not issued by registered dealers. The Department issued a show cause notice, alleging non-compliance with Rule 57G. The Deputy Commissioner confirmed the demand and imposed a penalty, which the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld, citing the invalidity of the invoices. The appellant contended that the invoices contained essential particulars and were supplemented by the supplier's invoice, pre-registration mandate not being applicable. The Counsel argued that since the necessary details were provided, Modvat credit should be granted.The Counsel highlighted that the invoices in question pertained to a period before dealer registration was mandatory, emphasizing the validity of the information provided in the invoices. The Department, represented by the SDR, reiterated the lower authorities' findings. Upon review, the Tribunal noted that essential particulars were indeed furnished, and supplementary information from the earlier manufacturer was also provided in some instances. Acknowledging the receipt, duty payment, and utilization of inputs in the final product, the Tribunal deemed the Modvat credit admissible.The Tribunal further observed that since the invoices related to a period prior to the registration mandate's enforcement, the requirement did not apply to the appellant's case. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and potentially granting consequential relief as per legal provisions.