Modvat credit on capital goods used in manufacture upheld despite nil-duty intermediate products in composite production.

Modvat credit was admissible on the TFO machine because it was used for multifolding and twisting yarn, an activity treated as part of manufacture under the tariff notes, so the machine qualified as capital goods. Credit could not be denied merely because wool top and yarn were intermediate products carrying nil duty in a composite manufacturing unit where the final fabric was dutiable. The credit claim was therefore upheld and the revenue challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the TFO machine as capital goods used in the manufacturing process. (ii) Whether Modvat credit could be denied because wool top and yarn were intermediate products carrying nil rate of duty.

Issue (i): Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the TFO machine as capital goods used in the manufacturing process.

Analysis: The TFO machine was used for multifolding and twisting yarn, and that activity was treated as part of manufacture under the relevant tariff notes. On that basis, the machine fell within the ambit of capital goods for Modvat purposes.

Conclusion: Modvat credit on the TFO machine was admissible.

Issue (ii): Whether Modvat credit could be denied because wool top and yarn were intermediate products carrying nil rate of duty.

Analysis: Wool top and yarn were only intermediate products in a composite manufacturing unit, while the final product was dutiable fabric. Credit could not be denied merely because the intermediate products were not chargeable to duty, and the rule protecting credit in such situations applied.

Conclusion: Modvat credit could not be denied on the ground that the intermediate products were exempt or carried nil duty.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order granting credit was sustained, and the Revenue's challenge failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a machine is used in a process treated as manufacture under the tariff notes, it qualifies for Modvat credit as capital goods, and credit is not denied merely because intermediate products in a composite manufacturing process are exempt or carry nil duty when the final product is dutiable.

---