1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal rules in favor of appeal, citing limitation bar and absence of wilful misstatement or fraud.</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the demand for misclassification of Varnish under Central Excise Rules was barred by limitation and lacked ... Demand - Limitation The appellant challenged a demand for misclassification of Varnish under Central Excise Rules. The department issued a demand notice three and a half years later, alleging wilful misstatement and fraud. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the demand was barred by limitation as the classification order was made after receiving the test report, and there was no evidence of wilful misstatement or fraud. The appeal was allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
