Customs prosecution and adjudication proceed independently; adjournment and personal appearance relief remain subject to trial court discretion.

Criminal proceedings under customs law are independent of parallel adjudication proceedings, and there is no automatic rule requiring a stay merely because adjudication is pending. The pendency and relevance of adjudication may, however, be considered by the criminal court when deciding an adjournment request under Section 309 CrPC, which must be exercised judicially and consistently with speedy trial principles. Requests for exemption from personal appearance are to be examined by the trial court under Section 205 CrPC. The petitioners were directed to appear before the ACMM and seek appropriate orders, leaving adjournment to the trial court.

---

---

Issues: Whether the criminal proceedings should be stayed or adjourned pending adjudication proceedings under the Customs Act, and how the trial court should deal with the petitioners' request for exemption from personal appearance.

Analysis: The proceedings under the customs law and the criminal prosecution are independent, and there is no rigid rule that a criminal case must be stayed merely because adjudication is pending. At the same time, the pendency and relevance of adjudication proceedings may be a relevant factor for the criminal court while considering an application for adjournment under Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The discretion under that provision must be exercised judicially, on relevant considerations, and in a manner consistent with the policy of speedy criminal justice. The court also noted that requests for exemption from personal appearance are to be considered by the trial court under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Conclusion: The petitions were not allowed to secure an automatic stay, but the petitioners were directed to appear before the ACMM and seek appropriate orders under Sections 205 and 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, leaving the question of adjournment to the trial court.

---