Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 12(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 applies only to exports made for sale or also extends to export-on-sale transactions where sale is completed before export.
Analysis: The expression "no person entitled to sell, or procure the sale of, the said goods" was held to be descriptive of the accountable person and not restrictive of the class of export transactions covered by the provision. Clauses (a) and (b) of section 12(2) were read as showing a legislative scheme directed to securing prompt and full repatriation of sale proceeds in all export situations. Section 10 was held not to govern foreign exchange earned from export of goods, because section 12 was treated as the specific and complete code dealing with export proceeds. Section 12(6) also supported this construction, since a narrower reading would weaken the compliance mechanism and defeat the statutory object of preventing loss or siphoning of foreign exchange.
Conclusion: Section 12(2) applies to sale proceeds arising from exports on sale as well as exports for sale, and the challenge to the show-cause notices on the ground of lack of applicability failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a provision governing export proceeds is designed to secure full repatriation of foreign exchange and contains an internal compliance mechanism, its opening words should be read descriptively rather than restrictively so as to advance the statutory object and avoid defeating the scheme of the Act.