Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        1986 (9) TMI 357 - SC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Sick textile undertaking takeover and nationalisation upheld, with vacant mill land held to vest in government. Takeover of a sick industrial undertaking under section 18A was sustained because the order rested on an investigation finding that management was highly ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Sick textile undertaking takeover and nationalisation upheld, with vacant mill land held to vest in government.

                          Takeover of a sick industrial undertaking under section 18A was sustained because the order rested on an investigation finding that management was highly detrimental to public interest, and it did not depend on a prior section 16 direction; non-supply of the report caused no shown prejudice. The Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 was also upheld as implementing Article 39(b) and therefore protected by Article 31C, defeating challenges under Articles 14 and 19, while the basic structure objection failed as the doctrine applies to constitutional amendments. Vacant land within the mill compound was treated as part of the undertaking and vested in the Central Government.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the order taking over the management of the undertaking under section 18A of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 was illegal or vitiated for want of a direction under section 16 or for non-supply of the investigation report. (ii) Whether the Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 was unconstitutional as offending Articles 14 and 19 or the basic structure doctrine. (iii) Whether the vacant land within the mill compound formed part of the textile undertaking and vested in the Central Government.

                          Issue (i): Whether the order taking over the management of the undertaking under section 18A of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 was illegal or vitiated for want of a direction under section 16 or for non-supply of the investigation report.

                          Analysis: The takeover was based on an investigation under section 15 and on a finding that the undertaking was being managed in a manner highly detrimental to public interest. Section 18A permitted takeover on that ground independently of any direction under section 16. The company had been heard by the Investigation Committee, and on the facts the non-supply of the report did not prejudice the petitioners or amount to a denial of natural justice. The long delay in challenging the order also weakened the challenge.

                          Conclusion: The takeover order under section 18A was upheld and the challenge failed.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 was unconstitutional as offending Articles 14 and 19 or the basic structure doctrine.

                          Analysis: The Act was held to give effect to the policy of the State under Article 39(b) and therefore to fall within the protective umbrella of Article 31C. Once protected by Article 31C, its provisions could not be struck down on the ground of violation of Articles 14 and 19. The Court also held that the basic structure challenge was misconceived because the doctrine operates against constitutional amendments, and the Act itself was an ordinary statute included in the Ninth Schedule through constitutional amendment. The challenge on this ground was therefore not maintainable.

                          Conclusion: The constitutional challenge to the Act failed.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the vacant land within the mill compound formed part of the textile undertaking and vested in the Central Government.

                          Analysis: Under section 4(1), the sick textile undertaking included all properties, movable and immovable, in the possession, power or control of the owner, including lands and buildings. The disputed land lay within the mill compound, and its present non-use did not exclude it from the statutory definition. The land was therefore treated as part of the undertaking and as having vested in the Central Government.

                          Conclusion: The vacant land was held to form part of the undertaking and the petitioners were not entitled to its return.

                          Final Conclusion: The writ petitions were rejected in entirety, and the takeover, nationalisation, and inclusion of the disputed land were all sustained.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A statute that gives effect to Article 39(b) and is protected by Article 31C cannot be invalidated on the ground of inconsistency with Articles 14 and 19, and property within the possession and control of the owner of a sick textile undertaking falls within the statutory vesting provision even if presently unused.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found