1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal overturns penalty on appellants for tax suppression on imported onions, citing Customs Act precedent.</h1> The Tribunal confirmed the demand for Special Additional Duty of Customs but set aside the penalty imposed on the appellants for willful suppression of ... Exemption - Demand - Import Issues:Import of onions from Pakistan, exemption from Special Additional Duty of Customs, verification of declaration by importer, imposition of penalty.Analysis:The appellants imported onions from Pakistan and claimed exemption from payment of Special Additional Duty of Customs under specific notifications. The condition for exemption was that the goods should not be sold from a place where no tax is chargeable on sale or purchase. An undertaking was given by the importers to pay the duty if the goods were sold in contravention of this condition. The appellants did not pay any tax on the imported onions, leading to allegations of willful suppression. Consequently, the goods were confiscated, and Special Additional Duty of Customs was demanded along with the imposition of a penalty.The appellants did not contest the confirmation of the demand for Special Additional Duty of Customs. However, they argued against the imposition of the penalty. The appellants relied on a previous Tribunal decision in a similar case to support their argument against the penalty. The Tribunal considered the interpretation of relevant provisions and held that the penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act was not imposable based on a decision of the Delhi High Court. The Tribunal set aside the penalty based on this reasoning.The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of the Special Additional Duty of Customs as it was not contested by the appellants. The decision on the penalty was based on the precedent cited by the appellants, leading to the setting aside of the penalty. Therefore, the appeals were disposed of with the confirmation of the duty and the setting aside of the penalty, following the precedent cited by the appellants.This judgment highlights the importance of complying with conditions for duty exemptions and the legal principles governing the imposition of penalties under the Customs Act. The decision emphasizes the need for consistency in applying legal interpretations and precedents to ensure fair treatment in customs-related matters.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
