Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Permanently Attached to Earth- Object of Annexation is Important

Rachit Agarwal
Movable vs immovable classification: detachable glass partitions treated as movable, preserving input tax credit eligibility. Applying the two-fold annexation test-extent of annexation and object of annexation-the detachable sliding and stackable glass partitions fixed by nuts and bolts but capable of dismantling and reuse are classified as movable property because they are not embedded in the earth and are affixed for temporary demarcation and privacy rather than permanent enjoyment of the land, rendering procurement eligible for input tax credit and outside the GST exclusion for construction of immovable property. (AI Summary)

In an Appeal filed before Appellate AAR, Karnataka by IN RE: M/S. WEWORK INDIA MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [2020 (5) TMI 388 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA]

Facts: The Appellant procures these items for the purpose of creating work spaces which are given out on rent to various companies and individuals as sharing work spaces. The detachable glass partitions are fixed to the ground with the help of nuts and bolt and the same can be dismantled and re-used.

Question: Whether an activity of fixing the detachable sliding and stackable glass partitions qualifies as ‘construction of an immovable property’ or not?

Order: The normal understanding of the term ‘construction’ is to ‘make or build’ something. In the Appellant’s case, as per the above said explanation, the addition of glass partitions qualifies as ‘construction’. This construction is done by the Appellant on his own account. What remains to be determined is whether the fixing of glass partitions amounts to construction of ‘immovable property’?

To ascertain whether the item is permanently attached to earth, many courts have consistently used two-fold tests -

(i) the extent of annexation and

(ii) the object of annexation.

The extent of annexation means annexing the fixture or object by which it ceases to be detachable. It would need to be demolished if one were to remove it.

The object of annexation test lays down that where a movable property gets annexed with an immovable property, if the intent of annexation is of permanent beneficial enjoyment of the immovable property, then the fixture becomes an immovable property.

If the intent of annexation is the beneficial enjoyment of the movable property, then the property still remains movable.

Applying the above tests to this case, we find that the glass partitions are not permanent and are not embedded to the earth. They can be dismantled and moved according to the requirements of the clients of the Appellant. Although they are fixed to the earth with nuts and bolts, they can be dismantled without demolishing the civil structure. Therefore, the detachable sliding and stackable glass partitions do not qualify as immovable property.

We have held that the glass partitions are movable property by applying the tests of extent and object of annexation

The intent of fixing the glass partitions is only to provide the clients a certain sense of privacy and for the purpose of demarcation of work space area. There is no permanency in affixing such partitions as the same can be dismantled and re-fixed to signify a change in the dimensions of the work space. The fixing of the partitions to the ground using nuts and bolts only serves to give a false sense of permanency while in reality it is not so. The detachable sliding and stackable glass partitions are movable property and addition /fixing of glass partitions does not amount to construction of immovable property. Therefore, the procurement of detachable sliding and stackable glass partitions will be eligible for input tax credit and will not be hit by the provisions of Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act.

Our Analysis: The order pronounced by the Appellate Authority is in-line with the Judicial Pronouncement by Supreme Court

  1. Supreme Court in case of Commr. of C. Ex., Ahmedabad Versus Solid & Correct Engineering Works [2010 (4) TMI 15 - SUPREME COURT]
  2. Supreme Court in case of Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. v. Collector - 1997 (12) TMI 109 - SUPREME COURT
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles