Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
- 0 - Views

Relief for importers as Gujarat HC Stays IGST levy on Ocean Freight

Date 21 May 2019
Replies1 Replies
Written By
Court Stays IGST on Ocean Freight, Eases Double Tax Burden for Importers; Further Hearings Awaited
The Gujarat High Court has issued a stay on the levy of Integrated Goods & Services Tax (IGST) on Ocean Freight, providing relief to importers facing double taxation. Under the current GST framework, importers pay IGST on Ocean Freight through the Reverse Charge Mechanism, in addition to customs duty on the CIF value of imports. The petition, led by a private company, argues against the redundancy and unfairness of this tax, especially in CIF contracts and High Seas Sales. The court's stay order aligns with previous similar cases, and the matter is set for further hearing. - (AI Summary)

Dear All,

Importer can breathe easy as the Gujarat High Court has stayed the levy of IGST (Integrated Goods & Service Tax) on Ocean Freight. IGST is levied on all Inter-State supplies of goods and / or services. It is also applicable on any supply of goods and/or services in cases of import into and export from the country.

Under GST, there is specific provision with respect of taxability on the component of Ocean Freight. The law specifically provides that the importers are required to discharge IGST at the rate of 5% on Ocean Freight services under RCM (Reverse Charge Mechanism). Under RCM, it is the duty of importer to pay IGST on behalf of foreign buyer. However at the same time, customs duty on the CIF value (which includes the component of freight as well) of the goods imported into India is also paid by the importer. As a result, there is double taxation on the component of Ocean freight under GST law which is an impediment and has bloated the cost of imports.

Keeping this in mind, a petition was filed with the Gujarat High Court by MOHIT MINERALS PVT LTD VERSUS UNION OF INDIA [ 2018 (2) TMI 770 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT ] challenging vires of IGST related notification. The petition has principally 3 elements;

  1. having paid the tax under IGST Act on the entire value of imports (inclusive of the Ocean Freight), the petitioner cannot be asked to pay tax on the Ocean freight all over again under different notification;
  2. in the case of CIF (Cost, Insurance & Freight) contracts, the service provider and service recipient both are outside the territory of India. No tax on such service can be collected even on reverse charge mechanism.
  3. in case of High Seas Sales, the burden is cast on the petitioner as an importer whereas, the petitioner is not the recipient of service at all. It is the petitioner's seller of goods on high seas basis who has received the services from the exporter/transporter. The matter is pending.

A similar petition was filed by Ghanshyamlal and Co. The court took notice of order passed in the previous matter and granted stay. Now notice has been issued to the Central Government and both the matter will be heard on June 19.

While the present order grants stay on levy of IGST on Ocean freight, it would be interesting to know the judgment and a great relief to the importers with the long pending double taxation issues, if settled.

1 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on May 21, 2019

There is nothing remarkable in the said stay order. Similar stay orders had been given before in some other cases, where the cause of action exists like in the case of M/s. Sal steel ltd v. UOI reported in 2019 (1) TMI 327 and in the case of M/s. Asahi Songwon Colors Ltd. v. UOI reported in 2019 (2) TMI 960, though these cases are not tagged with Mohit Minerals. Since these cases were not tagged with MOHIT MINERALS case, the same was not highighted before. The arguments advanced in those cases were also wide ranging and different in the sense it questioned the levy of service tax on services provided outside taxable territory and the methodology of fixing the value at 10% of CIF value etc. It is to be seen whether the Hon'ble High Court addresses these crucial issues as well. We have also filed a similar petition in the Gujarat High Court. It is a clear case of double taxation and even more so in the GST regime. The Courts should strike down such invalid and illegal levies through back door methods without considering the aspect of revenue involvement and this should be done retrospectively even for service tax regime. Till then, we have wait and watch.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Articles